article
2 rows where is-referenced-by-count = 19 sorted by title
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created (date), subject (array), ISSN (array), names (array), award_numbers (array), funder_dois (array)
| Link | rowid | title ▼ | DOI | URL | created | subject | references-count | is-referenced-by-count | ISSN | container-title | abstract | author_number | orcids | names | award_numbers | funder_names | funder_dois |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5 | ["How did a Housing First intervention improve health and social outcomes among homeless adults with mental illness in Toronto? Two-year outcomes from a randomised trial"] | 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010581 | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010581 | 2016-09-13T01:49:12Z | ["General Medicine"] | 0 | 19 | ["2044-6055", "2044-6055"] | BMJ Open | <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>We studied the impact of a Housing First (HF) intervention on housing, contact with the justice system, healthcare usage and health outcomes among At Home/Chez Soi randomised trial participants in Toronto, a city with an extensive service network for social and health services for individuals who are experiencing homelessness and mental illness.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Participants identified as high needs were randomised to receive either the intervention which provided them with housing and supports by an assertive community treatment team (HF+ACT) or treatment as usual (TAU). Participants (N=197) had in-person interviews every 3 months for 2 years.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The HF+ACT group spent more time stably housed compared to the TAU group with the mean difference between the groups of 45.8% (95% CI 37.1% to 54.4%, p<0.0001). Accounting for baseline differences, HF+ACT group showed significant improvements over TAU group for community functioning, selected quality-of-life subscales and arrests at some time points during follow-up. No differences between HF+ACT and TAU groups over the follow-up were observed for health service usage, community integration and substance use.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>HF for individuals with high levels of need increased housing stability and selected health and justice outcomes over 2 years in a city with many social and health services.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>ISRCTN42520374.</jats:p></jats:sec> | 10 | [] | ["Patricia O'Campo", "Vicky Stergiopoulos", "Pam Nir", "Matthew Levy", "Vachan Misir", "Antony Chum", "Bouchra Arbach", "Rosane Nisenbaum", "Matthew J To", "Stephen W Hwang"] | [""] | [""] | [""] |
| 6 | 6 | ["What\u2019s up doc? A national cross-sectional study of psychological wellbeing of hospital doctors in Ireland"] | 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018023 | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018023 | 2017-10-16T22:16:03Z | [] | 0 | 19 | ["2044-6055", "2044-6055"] | BMJ Open | <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To measure levels of psychological distress, psychological wellbeing and self-stigma in hospital doctors in Ireland.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>National cross-sectional study of randomised sample of hospital doctors. Participants provided sociodemographic data (age, sex, marital status), work grade (consultant, higher/basic specialist trainee), specialty and work hours and completed well-being questionnaires (the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, WHO Well-being Index, General Health Questionnaire) and single-item scales on self-rated health and self-stigma.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Irish publicly funded hospitals and residential institutions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>1749 doctors (response rate of 55%). All hospital specialties were represented except radiology.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Half of participants were men (50.5%). Mean hours worked per week were 57 hours. Over half (52%) rated their health as very good/excellent, while 50.5% reported positive subjective well-being (WHO-5). Over a third (35%) experienced psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire 12). Severe/extremely severe symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress were evident in 7.2%, 6.1% and 9.5% of participants (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale 21). Symptoms of distress, depression, anxiety and stress were significantly higher and levels of well-being were significantly lower in trainees compared with consultants, and this was not accounted for by differences in sociodemographic variables. Self-stigma was present in 68.4%.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The work hours of doctors working in Irish hospitals were in excess of European Working Time Directive’s requirements. Just over half of hospital doctors in Ireland had positive well-being. Compared with international e… | 5 | [] | ["Bl\u00e1naid Hayes", "Lucia Prihodova", "Gillian Walsh", "Frank Doyle", "Sally Doherty"] | [""] | [""] | [""] |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited
CREATE TABLE [article] ( [title] TEXT, [DOI] TEXT, [URL] TEXT, [created] TEXT, [subject] TEXT, [references-count] TEXT, [is-referenced-by-count] TEXT, [ISSN] TEXT, [container-title] TEXT, [abstract] TEXT, [author_number] TEXT, [orcids] TEXT, [names] TEXT, [award_numbers] TEXT, [funder_names] TEXT, [funder_dois] TEXT );